Dale Moore via spf-discuss
2014-05-08 18:43:02 UTC
I would post this to the mailing list srs-***@listbox.com, but it
appers that list is deprecated in spite of being listed at
http://www.libsrs2.org/support.html .
Please forgive me if this has been discussed before, but I did some
searching
and didn't find anything appropriate.
In the paper http://www.libsrs2.org/srs/srs.pdf
The resolution is one day, and it is a 10 bit number stored as 2 base32
characters.
The timestamp is computed as unix time / (60 * 60 * 24) mod 2 ^ 10 .
This gives 1024 possible timestamps, with approximately a 3.5 year cycle
before a
timestamp becomes valid again.
And on the wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Rewriting_Scheme
- *The timestamp* (TT) has a one-day resolution in order to make the
address invalid after a few days. Computed as unix
time<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_time>
â(60*60*24) mod 210, it can be stored as a two
base32<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base32> characters,
with a recycling period of about 3.5 years.
So, wouldn't the cycle time be
- 2^10 days or
- 1024 days or
- (1024 / 365) years or
- 2.8 years?
I don't understand where 3.5 years come from.
Dale W Moore
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.net [http://www.openspf.net]
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/ [http://www.listbox.com/member/]
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/6959934-50ec8f89
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959934&id_secret=6959934-b7c4528d
Unsubscribe Now: https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=6959934&id_secret=6959934-edadf31a&post_id=20140508144545:A9A15FCC-D6E0-11E3-BA46-9D11EEE933BF
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
appers that list is deprecated in spite of being listed at
http://www.libsrs2.org/support.html .
Please forgive me if this has been discussed before, but I did some
searching
and didn't find anything appropriate.
In the paper http://www.libsrs2.org/srs/srs.pdf
The resolution is one day, and it is a 10 bit number stored as 2 base32
characters.
The timestamp is computed as unix time / (60 * 60 * 24) mod 2 ^ 10 .
This gives 1024 possible timestamps, with approximately a 3.5 year cycle
before a
timestamp becomes valid again.
And on the wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Rewriting_Scheme
- *The timestamp* (TT) has a one-day resolution in order to make the
address invalid after a few days. Computed as unix
time<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_time>
â(60*60*24) mod 210, it can be stored as a two
base32<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base32> characters,
with a recycling period of about 3.5 years.
So, wouldn't the cycle time be
- 2^10 days or
- 1024 days or
- (1024 / 365) years or
- 2.8 years?
I don't understand where 3.5 years come from.
Dale W Moore
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.net [http://www.openspf.net]
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/ [http://www.listbox.com/member/]
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/6959934-50ec8f89
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959934&id_secret=6959934-b7c4528d
Unsubscribe Now: https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=6959934&id_secret=6959934-edadf31a&post_id=20140508144545:A9A15FCC-D6E0-11E3-BA46-9D11EEE933BF
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com