Review of draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting

[Scott Kitterman]

I think this is getting close to ready, so I would appreciate it if people
here would review the draft and provide comments:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting/?include_text=1

Thanks.

Scott K

[Stuart D Gathman]

Long ago, Nostradamus foresaw that on 02/03/2012 05:33 PM, Scott

Post by Scott Kitterman
I think this is getting close to ready, so I would appreciate it if people
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting/?include_text=1

Shouldn't the spec mention explicitly that the requested "report" should
be a DSN? This is implied by mentioning DSN in security considerations,
and including DSN in the informative links. But I found myself thinking
the whole time while reading the spec, "so what format are the reports in?"

[Scott Kitterman]

Post by Stuart D Gathman
Long ago, Nostradamus foresaw that on 02/03/2012 05:33 PM, Scott

Post by Scott Kitterman
I think this is getting close to ready, so I would appreciate it if
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting/?include_t
ext=1

Shouldn't the spec mention explicitly that the requested "report" should
be a DSN? This is implied by mentioning DSN in security considerations,
and including DSN in the informative links. But I found myself thinking
the whole time while reading the spec, "so what format are the reports in?"

This is in many respects similar to a DSN (so the considerations are simlar),
but it's not a DSN, it's an ARF. This is clarified in the drafts that go with
this:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-as/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report/

Thanks for reviewing.

Scott K